Foundry Law Group Blog

Acquisition – When Should I Hire an Attorney?

Acquisition FLG


Congrats on the acquisition prospect! This is both an exciting and nerve-racking opportunity. Hiring an attorney during an acquisition is a natural expectation. The question we are addressing in this post is when to do so.


Hire an Attorney Before Signing a Letter of Intent

The early stages of the acquisition processes generally share certain common characteristics. The target company (or Seller) and the Buyer might already be under a Non-Disclosure Agreement (an NDA). Some amount of early financial diligence is occurring. The acquirer’s interest in the acquisition remains steady. The target company/Seller might even be negotiating some early terms of the acquisition themselves (or with a broker).

At some point, the Buyer will present a Letter of Intent (or LOI), sometimes an Indication of Interest (or IOI).


What is a Letter of Intent?


A Letter of Intent is the acquirer’s preliminary commitment to the acquisition. A Letter of Intent is generally non-binding as to certain terms and serves to lay out the general terms of the transaction. Letters of an Intent might include terms such as exclusivity periods, a plan for the next stage of due diligence, valuation, and other terms. The purpose of the Letter of Intent is to lay the groundwork that culminates in a definitive purchase agreement. The time to hire an attorney is BEFORE you sign the Letter of Intent or Indication of Interest.


Important Terms of an Acquisition are in the Letter of Intent


Even though LOIs and IOIs are generally non-binding, acquirers such as large enterprises and private equity groups tend to include critical legal terms. This comes at a stage where the target company might not be represented by a lawyer and inadvertently agrees to terms that are difficult to negotiate later.


Aren’t Letters of Intent Non-Binding?


While LOIs and IOIs are non-binding, certain terms such as confidentiality and exclusivity are binding and the rest of the terms form the basis of a later deal. It might be difficult or impossible to remove unfavorable terms later on. It also fosters in the Buyer an expectation that such terms will be in the ultimate agreement.

An indemnity holdback is a common example of a critical term in an LOI. An indemnity holdback is a percentage (often 10-15%) of the purchase price held in escrow (usually for 18-24 months). The indemnity holdback is used as security for the acquirer against the possible indemnity claims.

So while this term is non-binding, it is a critical term that creates an expectation about the transaction. Attempting to negotiate this tern further along in the process might stop the transaction entirely.


Contact Foundry Law Group to Assist with your Acquisition


If you find yourself on the path toward acquisition we recommend reaching out as early in the process as possible. It is critical to advise on the deal and remain involved even if you or your broker are currently taking the lead with the buyer’s business team. We align with your team and support you as you proceed. Our goal is to help you feel confident with your acquisition negotiations and, ultimately, the deal.

We offer flat-fee packages for acquisitions with a large portion paid out of the closing. If you are involved with a possible acquisition, contact Foundry Law Group as early as possible in the process so that we can assist with your acquisition process.

Leave a Reply